Manual data collection
Analysts spend months extracting batch, lab and deviation data by hand from half a dozen systems.
Automate Annual Product Quality Reviews by consolidating quality, manufacturing, laboratory and deviation data into a centralized platform that generates regulator-ready reports, identifies trends and supports continuous process improvement.
APQR · Review period 2025–26
Product quality intelligence
Batches reviewed
248
Quality index
96.4
Deviations
17
Open CAPA
4
Cpk trend · critical parameters
Most quality teams spend more time collecting the data than analysing it — and the review is late, manual and hard to defend.
Analysts spend months extracting batch, lab and deviation data by hand from half a dozen systems.
Spreadsheets are copied, versioned and emailed until nobody knows which file is the approved one.
Quality, laboratory, manufacturing and ERP data live apart, with no common product or batch key.
Reviews start late, run for weeks and are still being compiled when the due date arrives.
Reports describe what happened without the statistical trending that would have predicted it.
Inspectors challenge the completeness, timeliness and traceability of the review data.
The same regulatory obligation, produced from live source data instead of months of extraction, formatting and reconciliation.
Traditional APQR process
Nexgensis digital APQR
Data is collected automatically from every integrated system, validated, trended and transformed into a comprehensive APQR report — with actions carried into the next review period.
Batch, laboratory, deviation, complaint and change data pulled automatically.
Completeness, range and reconciliation checks before anything is trended.
Records consolidated by product, strength, site and review period.
Statistical trending, capability and year-on-year comparison generated.
QA reviews findings, adds assessment and conclusions in the system.
Routed electronic approval with Part 11 signatures and comments.
The final APQR/PQR report issued in a controlled, exportable format.
Actions raised as CAPA and tracked into the next review period.
Every figure in the report is pulled from its system of record and stays linked to it, so any number can be traced back to the batch, result or event behind it.
eQMS
Deviations, CAPA, complaints, change control and audits.
LIMS
Release, in-process and stability laboratory results.
eBMR
Batch execution, yield, in-process checks and exceptions.
DMS
Specifications, SOPs and controlled report templates.
ERP
Batch genealogy, dispatch, returns and material master data.
MES
Process parameters and equipment performance data.
OPS IQ APQR
Quality data core
Supplier Quality
Vendor performance, rejections and qualification status.
Stability Studies
Ongoing and accelerated stability data by condition.
Complaint Management
Market complaints, categories and confirmed defects.
CAPA
Corrective and preventive actions with effectiveness checks.
Change Control
Product, process and equipment changes in the period.
Laboratory Results
Analytical data, OOS and OOT investigations.
Capability, control charts and year-on-year comparison calculated on the same data set that produces the regulatory report.
Process capability · Product A, 10 mg
Assay (%)
CapableCp 1.62
Cpk 1.48
Dissolution (%)
CapableCp 1.44
Cpk 1.31
Hardness (N)
MarginalCp 1.18
Cpk 1.02
Weight variation
CapableCp 1.87
Cpk 1.74
Critical quality attributes trended across the review period.
Yield and reconciliation compared batch to batch and year to year.
Recurrence by category, area, equipment and root cause.
Complaint rate normalised per million units dispatched.
Laboratory result excursions with investigation outcomes.
Capability indices per parameter with specification limits applied.
Capability status flagged as capable, marginal or at risk.
Control charts with rule violations highlighted automatically.
This period against the previous periods, product by product.
Approved templates populate themselves from live data; QA adds the assessment and the report is signed and issued under change control.
Report generation workflow
The full review generated from live data, not retyped from spreadsheets.
One report per product, strength, pack and market as required.
Site and cross-site consolidations on a single corporate standard.
Formatted to satisfy 21 CFR 211.180(e) and EU GMP Chapter 1 PQR.
Conclusions, product disposition and recommendations up front.
Standalone trend packs for management and quality council review.
Controlled PDF for issue plus Excel data extracts for analysis.
Author, review and approve with Part 11 electronic signatures.
Reviews are completed on schedule, every figure is traceable to its source record, and the evidence is produced during the inspection itself.
Electronic records and signatures with secure, computer-generated audit trails.
Computerised system controls, access management and periodic review.
Product quality review as part of the pharmaceutical quality system.
Annual product review expectations for products and starting materials.
Indian GMP product quality review and record retention requirements.
Risk-based validation with documented lifecycle deliverables per release.
Attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original, accurate and complete data.
Meaning-bound signatures on authoring, review and approval steps.
Every data pull, recalculation and approval permanently recorded.
Source-linked figures with no manual retyping between systems.
The same data that produces the annual review drives live dashboards for quality councils, site leadership and corporate QA.
Annual quality index · rolling 12 months
0
Quality index
0%
Right first time
0
Products reviewed
0%
Reviews on time
A weighted index combining deviations, complaints, OOS and capability.
Right-first-time, yield and rejection rate by product and line.
Capability trended over time for every critical parameter.
Complaint volume, category mix and confirmation rate.
Open, overdue and effectiveness-pending actions by product.
Deviation counts by classification, area and recurrence.
Studies in progress, results due and any adverse trends.
A single comparable score by product, site and review period.
0%
Faster APQR preparation
0%
Automated data collection
0%
Less manual reporting effort
0%
Faster management reviews
Product performance visible all year, not reconstructed at year end.
Statistical trending surfaces drift before it becomes a deviation.
Reviews completed on time with traceable, source-linked data.
One version of quality truth across products, sites and periods.
APQR reads directly from eQMS, LIMS, eBMR, DMS and eLogs — no exports.
Source-linked figures assembled by product, strength, site and period.
Trending, capability and SPC across every product and every plant.
21 CFR 211.180(e), EU GMP Chapter 1, ICH Q10 and Part 11 aligned.
Corporate standard templates with governed site-level variations.
Deploy in our validated cloud or inside your own data centre.
From a handful of products to a global portfolio across every site.
Pattern detection that highlights what deserves attention first.
A first product family typically goes live in 10 to 14 weeks, including data mapping, connectors, templates and validation.
Phase 1
Product scope, review template review and data source mapping.
Phase 2
Connectors to eQMS, LIMS, eBMR, ERP, MES and stability systems.
Phase 3
Report templates, trending rules, capability limits and approval routes.
Phase 4
IQ/OQ/PQ execution with GAMP 5 aligned documentation.
Phase 5
First review cycle run in parallel, then spreadsheets retired.
Automate Annual Product Quality Reviews with Nexgensis APQR to eliminate manual reporting, accelerate regulatory reviews, identify trends earlier and drive continuous product quality improvement.
Quick actions